restgoal.blogg.se

Wxhexeditor windows
Wxhexeditor windows






wxhexeditor windows
  1. #WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS FULL VERSION#
  2. #WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS LICENSE KEY#
  3. #WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS MAC OS X#
  4. #WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS SERIAL#
  5. #WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS SOFTWARE#

usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/atk/InterfaceInitFuncs.h

wxhexeditor windows

usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/atk/DocAccessibleWrap.h usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/atk/AtkSocketAccessible.h usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/atk/ApplicationAccessibleWrap.h usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/atk/AccessibleWrap.h usr/src/debug/firefox-62.0.86_64/accessible/aom/AccessibleNode.h $ rpm -qlp firefox-debugsource-62.0.86_64.rpm | grep "h$" | head I couldn't find further information on exactly what should be in the debugsource package, but using an example of Firefox, Since that package isn't something that I actually created myself, my expectation is that the Fedora system knows which header files are useful for creating a valid debugsource package. Those header files aren't actually useful for development and this tool is not really intended to be a usable library as I understand. > - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. (In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #7) Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see : Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any thatĪre listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/HexPanels.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorFrame.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/wxHexCtrl.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/TagDialogGui.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorCtrl/wxHexCtrl/Tag.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorCtrl/He圎ditorCtrlGui.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/He圎ditorCtrl/He圎ditorCtrl.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/HexDialogs.h usr/src/debug/wxHe圎86_64/src/FAL.h wxHe圎ditor.

wxhexeditor windows

Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Should I download the tarball, compute the sha256 and manually validate it in the spec file, or is having a sha256 something that the Fedora infrastructure would take care of? Apparently, I'm supposed to file a bug for this, but I suspect that I should wait for this package to be accepted (or rejected) before doing that. I will attach the errors to this bug (if I can) or I will comment with their contents. I think it's in the base Wx Widget library, and I haven't dug into it yet. There's a failure on AArch64 and Armv7hl. I don't know if it was meant as "Either the GPLv2 or later" or not, so I'd like to be safe until I can clarify with the author. I'm not sure what exactly is meant here, but I will clarify with the author if I can get in contact. I used GPLv2 because I believe that to be accurate.

#WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS SOFTWARE#

I would like to upstream them, but they're so specific to building that they're not likely worth the effort unless the tool is packaged into Fedora.ĥ * This program is free software you can redistribute it and/or *Ħ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License *ħ * as published by the Free Software Foundation either version 2 * There's 3 patches relating to the build system. I cannot find contact details for the author of the tool, so I haven't been in touch yet. I tried to follow the various packaging docs as best as I could, but there's 5 different wiki pages to follow. I have been doing peer review for software for the last 10 years. I have worked for Mozilla on the release engineering team, the Firefox OS build team and currently on our CI platform. The docs said to include background information which might be relevant. It is the first time using a new FAS account "jhford", which is what I'd rather use from now on. This is not my first package, but the first in just under 10 years. Lotus Notes Contacts to Outlook 8.12.Description: wxHe圎ditor is a graphical hex editor that I likeįedora Account System Username: jhford (also have john64, but not using it any more) Most popular windows 9 in File & Disk Management downloads for Vista

#WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS MAC OS X#

Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 2003, Windows Vista, Windows Vista 圆4, Unix, Linux, Linux Gnome, Linux GPL, Linux Open Source, Mac PPC, Mac OS X, Mac OS X 10.4, Mac OS X 10.5Īdd Your Review or Windows Vista Compatibility Report Download links are directly from our mirrors or publisher's website, wxHe圎ditor torrent files or shared files from rapidshare,

#WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS LICENSE KEY#

License key is illegal and prevent future development of

#WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS SERIAL#

Software piracy is theft, using crack, warez passwords, patches, serial numbers, registration codes, key generator, keymaker or keygen for wxHe圎ditor

#WXHEXEDITOR WINDOWS FULL VERSION#

Categories: hex editor huge file Download wxHe圎ditorīest Vista Download periodically updates pricing and software information of wxHe圎ditor full version from the publisher,īut some information may be out-of-date.








Wxhexeditor windows